Search This Blog

Friday, February 20, 2015

1C: FAIR PLAY GROUP PRESENTATIONS



FAIR PLAY group presentations
You'll see on the syllabus that there are Fair Play group presentations coming up. They will be about one of the scenarios from Fair Play. Groups will pick their scenario from the book, but it must be one that is different than all other scenarios presented or one that I have scheduled for the class.

Groups will be formed at random by the instructor. Groups can request to do a particular scenario, but their preference is not a guarantee of assignment. Each student in the group will also write an essay about the assigned scenario and the moral questions raised by it. Details about the essay will be made available at the February 19th class.

Once your group is formed contact other members of your group by email, text or in-person. 

Read all scenarios to be presented by the class. When not presenting give the presenters your attention and participate in the discussion.

The group presentations will last at a minimum of 30 minutes each.  Often they last longer.


All group members should assist--must assist--in the preparation and presentation of the analysis of the scenario.


Research for the Presentation and Essay: Here are some tasks each group must perform. Do research for the presentation:  When gathering information, whether written or video text, be sure to test the source for reliability and relevance.  I invite you to look at Secrecy News website and search for additional sources.  Make use of Olson's book, from his openings (i.e., Preface, Acknowledgements, Introduction, Philosophical and Historical Arguments, U.S. Attitudes to Toward Spying) to the end of the book (Afterword, Notes About the author).

More Research for the Presentation and Essay: Searching EBSCOhost should suffice in finding sources. If you have not used EBSCOhost before you will find a link to it on the PCC library's page for databases. EBSCOhost is helpful because you can limit your search to types of publications, including scholarly journals, particular newspapers and magazines, and full-text articles. Also, work with members of your group to find sources, especially as you get ready to do your presentation. Your colleagues may be the best sources you have. Having trouble finding EBSCOhost? Try this link.


Other things to keep in mind for your presentation:

*Offer detailed real-life examples similar to the scenario that you are assigned.

*Present both sides of the argument.

*When making your presentation engage the class and, importantly, other members of your group re: the scenario's debate.  Notes are fine, but please do not read from a prepared essay.

*Look at the presentation as an opportunity to teach each other and the class about the issue involved. You can act (yes, theatrical performances are welcomed), offer examples from history (teach yourself and us something), and use visuals (a little video entertainment or work of art can often be helpful.) Powerpoint presentations are not necessary. Sometimes you are better off without them.

*Good video sources include various PBS news programs. Find links to these sources and other news outlets at English with McCabe under the category for "NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES, JOURNALS, FILM, TV & RADIO." You'll find it on the right side of the blog's front page. 

CONTACT ME BY EMAIL RE: group's preferences
One person from each group must send me and all group members one email by Tues., Feb. 17th, 10:00PM with the following information:
On the subject line:
English 1C day, section number, day & time we meet, FAIR PLAY
In the message field:
Provide four scenario and date preferences. Rank scenario preferences, one, two, etc. For each scenario provide its title, scenario number, and page number. Name your date preferences in order of preference; first, second, etc. The scheduled dates of the presentations appear on the syllabus. Note: these dates are always subject to change.
After the list of scenarios and dates, list the FULL NAMES (as they appear on the roll, plus nickname, if they have one) of the group members.
Remember, get this information to me by Tuesday, February 17th, 10 PM. The sooner you send this email to me the better chance you will have of getting your preferred scenario and date to present.
I will notify by email assigned scenarios and presentation date.

Documenting James Olson's Fair Play for your essay
In your essay you are likely to include a passage that Olson has quoted. You are, then, "quoting a quote," more commonly referred to as an indirect source. For your  in-text citation when Olson quotes someone else, whether it is a philosopher (like Aristotle) or a commentator (like Adm. Bobby Inman), do the following: within your signal phrase name the person that Olson is quoting; introduce the quote; present the quoted material; and then follow the quoted passage with this parenthetical citation: (qtd. in Olson 15). The "15" represents an example of the page number where the quoted passage appears. When presenting Olson's Fair Play on the Works Cited page, just give the standard bibliographic entry for a book. You will not be naming the philosopher (like Aristotle) or commentator (like Adm. Bobby Inman) in the bibliographic entry.

If you have questions or comments about the assignment, whether the written or class presentation portion, post them in this comment section in English.



Here are other sources to see: A brief interview with Olson about Fair Play from CSPAN 2.   The CIA posted a review of Fair Play on their website May 2007.


As we read Fair Play and information about its author James Olson, it is worth taking a look at a couple of links about him and Valerie Plame; all are related to Fair Play, the book by James Olson.  He mentions Plame in his book.




James Olson interview on YouTube (embedded above)

Dave McIntyre biography (the man who interviewed James Olson). 

Valerie Plame on 60 minutes (updated link, 1/14/13)


Valerie Plame's Fair Game first chapter and reviews at Amazon and  news about Plame at The New York Times

*Videos re: History of the CIA:
Tim Weiner, reporter for The New York Times and author of Legacy of Ashes: History of the CIA, talks about his book on C-SPAN in 2007. You can watch it here. You can also watch his talk on the CIA at the WGBH Forum. The U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee released a report in December 2014 about the CIA and the use of torture. Weiner was interviewed by U.S. News and World Report about the committee's findings. More links to Tim Weiner topics can be found at the National Book Award site; the National Book Award was given to Weiner for his book Legacy of Ashes

Former English 1C student Gerardo Sanchez posted a comment with an interesting link.  Operation Dark Heart by Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer (ret.) was censored, or redacted as we have seen practiced in Fair Play. As Gerardo reports,  "Recently the book Operation Dark Heart was censored by the government [which] purchased 10,000 first edition printings, destroyed them, and redacted the second edition."  Follow the links and see a side-by-side comparison of pages as they appeared in Operation Dark Heart's original form and the redacted version.  Thanks, Gerardo!


The Los Angeles Times reported on 10/10/10 that the censorship of Operation Dark Heart pushed it up the bestseller lists for Amazon.com and The New York Times.

John S. Friedman, editor of Secret Histories, produced the documentary Hotel Terminus: The Life and Times of Klaus Barbie, which won an Academy Award.  Here is a link to part I of Hotel Terminus (link is now broken) a nearly four hour documentary about the notorious Nazi torturer. The complete film is 233 minutes long.


The above articles and film reminded me of Stephen Aftergood, publisher of Secrecy News, his blog for the Federation of American Scientists.  His site, he says, "works to challenge excessive government secrecy and to promote civilian oversight." Often he publishes government documents that have been declassified or leaked to him and the press.  Some examples include the infamous  Bush Office of Legal Counsel Torture Memos, featuring the August 1, 2002 memorandum for John Rizzo, Acting General Counsel of the CIA.


Here is an  interview that U.S. News and World Report conducted with Aftergood.

27 comments:

  1. Think the CIAs censorship in Olson's book I'd bad? Atleast it got printed. Recently the book Operation Dark Heart was censored by the government who purchased 10,000 first edition printings, destroyed them, and redacted the second edition.

    huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/29/operation-dark-heart-comp_n_744123.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gerardo,
    Thanks. It seems that sometimes we don't have any real news unless we cover it up.
    --Christopher McCabe

    ReplyDelete
  3. We picked the following scenarios for our group:

    #6: Kidnapping and Torture by Surrogates
    #17: Child Prostitute
    #23: Feeding A Drug Habit
    #26: L-Devices
    #50: Interrogation

    Yesenia, Gerardo, Amanda, Jennifer

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Scenarios we picked are listed below:

    #50 (pg 218)
    #5 (pg 61)
    #15 (pg 97)
    #29 (pg 145)
    #24 (pg 126)

    Kelsey, Jackie, Isaias, Oscar

    ReplyDelete
  5. scenarios:

    #5
    #16
    #40
    #44
    #50

    Rebekah, Nelson, Natalie, Michelle

    ReplyDelete
  6. Professor MCCABE!!!!!!!!!! i finally figured out how to post comments! yay!!!!!! :)

    -Red

    ReplyDelete
  7. Red!
    History was made today!
    --Christopher McCabe

    ReplyDelete
  8. Here it goes again!

    Scenarios:
    #2
    #14
    #11
    #12
    #34
    But today in class we went with scenarios:
    14 & 2

    Cecily, Kairo, Abi, Mark, Araceli, Wilson

    ReplyDelete
  9. Scenarios:
    #10
    #23
    #21
    #5

    And in Class we went with Scenarios 23 and 10

    Ricardo, Katelyn, Sarah, Jhara.

    ReplyDelete
  10. GROUP PRESENTATION QUESTIONS
    How long does the presentation have to be?

    I am not sure what we are supposed to do for the group presentation. Is the group just reading the scenario to the class and presenting their position?

    Also,it is possible that we may all have different views on the scenario so do we present every side? Or do we have to choose a side and sort of persuade the audience to agree with us?

    ReplyDelete
  11. YESSENIA!

    i believe he meant that we lead the discussion, so i see it as more of a discussion than a presentation..
    he also said that we should research a little more on the scenarios we chose.

    ReplyDelete
  12. ARACELI!
    You got it right! Being ready to lead the discussion--offer your insight, raise provocative questions--is the job the groups are taking on. You might want to do some research. Maybe there are actual events that are similar to the scenario that you'd like to tell us about. Another option: draw some connections between the scenario and Olson's sections on his "Philosophical and Historical Arguments" or his "Notes: Spying 101" sections. Or any other approach that helps your discussion.
    Thanks, Yesenia, for your question!
    Thanks, Araceli, for your response!
    --Christopher McCabe

    ReplyDelete
  13. oh. We chose 16 and 44 was our second choice.
    for the other group that is presenting thursday, they chose 17 and 50 was their second choice (but another group chose 50 so i dont know about that)

    -Red

    ReplyDelete
  14. sorry for the late post, but like Red said, 17 was our first choice and 6 was our second.
    See you in class tomorrow, good night.
    -Gerardo

    ReplyDelete
  15. URGENT!!
    hey professor i am going to be running a little late tomorrow, not later than 15 min, but i will show up to class.
    It's just that i have to take my baby brother to school. Sorry
    -Araceli Gonzalez

    ReplyDelete
  16. Gerardo and Araceli,
    Thanks for the posts.
    --Christopher McCabe

    ReplyDelete
  17. Interesting SCENARIO Tuesday! Gerardo and I were saying that the question is not (or should not be) if it is moral or not but if it should be done. That's with every scenario. To answer the question, as Gerardo said, we must first define moral.

    ReplyDelete
  18. professor mccabe i was wondering what I missed in class on tuesday?? do I need to have anything by tomorrow??

    ReplyDelete
  19. Cecily,
    If you haven't spoken with members of your group, you should; at this time they will give you the best overview of Tuesday's class. The other: see the home page of the blog and read the section on the class updates (it is near the top) for the week. You'll see the 1C section and the assignment that the class has for tomorrow.
    --Christopher McCabe

    ReplyDelete
  20. the link does not work..everytime I click on it wont pop up!

    Cecily Fraser

    ReplyDelete
  21. Cecily,
    The link works in two different places on the home page. Try them both.

    1.
    In the section near the top where there are class updates go to the For 1C section and read down until you get to the highlighted "here". Click on it. I tried it and it works.


    2.
    It also works in the Fair Play post. Click on the highlighted section within the passage that reads:

    "Some examples include the infamous Bush Office of Legal Counsel Torture Memos, featuring the August 1, 2002 memorandum for John Rizzo, Acting General Counsel of the CIA."

    This one will also take you to the same document.

    --Christopher McCabe

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hey prof Mccabe!
    umm you know the ppt you showed us on Th? how are we gonna do the essay again?

    ReplyDelete
  23. Essay Responses

    There will be five group presentations However, you need to write just four responses (not five). You must write a response to your group’s scenario, and then pick three others. Essay responses are due at the beginning of class on the day the assigned group does its scenario presentations. There will be no exceptions to these deadlines.

    Essay Template
    What follows is a guide, not a prescription for a 1-2 typed page response to the scenario’s ethical question. Be concise. Edit and revise your response throughly.

    Title: Use the title of the Scenario, including the number

    Part I. (about 5-7 sentences)
    Introduce the scenario: what is the situation and who are the agents and sources

    Present the question of the debate and the argument for each side

    Part II. (about a paragraph)

    Opposing point of view

    Part III. (about 2-3 paragraphs)

    Response to opposing point of view
    The Opposition’s strengths and weaknesses
    Your Position with sufficient reasons and analysis
    Conclusion

    Note: you may use the arguments presented by the responders and Olson, but be sure to give them credit. However, do not write a response--your response--that is just a restatement of someone else’s position.

    --Christopher McCabe

    ReplyDelete
  24. THANKS PROF! :D that helps alot! now i can get this done lol and get it over with

    ReplyDelete
  25. Dates for Group Presentations. Changes have been made for some groups. Please notify your group members once you see the dates.

    Tuesday, 10/18 Group: Ivy, Nancy, etc.

    Tuesday, 10/25 Group: Tina, Connie, etc.
    Tuesday, 10/25 Group: Emmanuel, Sarah, etc.

    Thurs., 10/27 Group: Janice, Kathleen, etc.
    Thurs., 10/27 Group: Mark, Juliet, etc.

    ReplyDelete